Jump to content

Wow ND to the ACC! Now what for the BE?


Bulls1181

Recommended Posts


  • Group:  Member
  • Topic Count:  0
  • Content Count:  184
  • Reputation:   10
  • Days Won:  0
  • Joined:  08/06/2003

all this is is espn keeping the one piece of ND that they can. their olympic sports. big deal. sure it hurts that it won't be part of our NBC deal and it will cost us some but it won't destroy the conference.

This move might not kill the Big East but what if the ACC takes Uconn or Rutgers to keep an even number of Olympic sports members?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 220
  • Created
  • Last Reply

  • Group:  Member
  • Topic Count:  0
  • Content Count:  820
  • Reputation:   5
  • Days Won:  0
  • Joined:  07/14/2011

I am saying after Pitt and Cuse left the buyout went ro $10 mil to trap others.

If UL pays FSU $20 mil, FSU comes up with $10a mil, and each school takes $2 mil (~20 percent as discussed for going to 12) for 1 year theres $50 mil

Would UL(Papa John )does pay that ad their exit fee to get to Big 12, to keep Charlie Strong, and get the Tier 1&2 deal and keep their Tier 3. Absolutely!

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Member
  • Topic Count:  0
  • Content Count:  511
  • Reputation:   20
  • Days Won:  1
  • Joined:  12/19/2006

all this is is espn keeping the one piece of ND that they can. their olympic sports. big deal. sure it hurts that it won't be part of our NBC deal and it will cost us some but it won't destroy the conference.

It will hurt our per team payout but it will still pay us a large increase over what we have not. Will it be a $17M per school agreement,no, but it will still be enough to remain competitive. I thikn we will end up around $12-$15M per school when the new TV deal is done. The problem is will it be high enough to warrant everyone giving up the rights? That I am not sure of.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Member
  • Topic Count:  0
  • Content Count:  8,722
  • Reputation:   992
  • Days Won:  23
  • Joined:  02/02/2005

all this is is espn keeping the one piece of ND that they can. their olympic sports. big deal. sure it hurts that it won't be part of our NBC deal and it will cost us some but it won't destroy the conference.

This move might not kill the Big East but what if the ACC takes Uconn or Rutgers to keep an even number of Olympic sports members?

why? so every member gets less money?

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Member
  • Topic Count:  0
  • Content Count:  8,722
  • Reputation:   992
  • Days Won:  23
  • Joined:  02/02/2005

I am saying after Pitt and Cuse left the buyout went ro $10 mil to trap others.

If UL pays FSU $20 mil, FSU comes up with $10a mil, and each school takes $2 mil (~20 percent as discussed for going to 12) for 1 year theres $50 mil

Would UL(Papa John )does pay that ad their exit fee to get to Big 12, to keep Charlie Strong, and get the Tier 1&2 deal and keep their Tier 3. Absolutely!

again why would fsu leave this week ,and pay $50m regardless of who pays it, when they could have left last week and not pay $50M.

if it was going to happen, it would have happened before today. it would have saved all those involved $25M +

they aren't going to move for an additional $3M. they wouldn't play in their region and the competition would be much greater.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Member
  • Topic Count:  0
  • Content Count:  8,722
  • Reputation:   992
  • Days Won:  23
  • Joined:  02/02/2005

I am saying after Pitt and Cuse left the buyout went ro $10 mil to trap others.

If UL pays FSU $20 mil, FSU comes up with $10a mil, and each school takes $2 mil (~20 percent as discussed for going to 12) for 1 year theres $50 mil

Would UL(Papa John )does pay that ad their exit fee to get to Big 12, to keep Charlie Strong, and get the Tier 1&2 deal and keep their Tier 3. Absolutely!

oh by the way that increased buyout was agreed to by everyone.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  TBP Subscriber III
  • Topic Count:  0
  • Content Count:  23,149
  • Reputation:   6,116
  • Days Won:  109
  • Joined:  09/13/2007

Just watched Brett McM and some other guy on Outside the Lines. Brett said that the ACC has language in their deal with ESPN that would allow for them to get a bump up from their $17 in the current contract. Neither Brett nor the other guy see Big 12 adding teams. The crux of the argument is that there is no one (Brett mentioned L'ville) that the Big 12 could add that would raise the Per Team dollars. So adding L'ville, USF, Cinci, Rutgers or whoever, while increasing total revenue for the conference, would dilute the per team take. Makes sense to me. I think any chance, and not a big one at that, of a Big 12 entry passed with Lee Roy Selmon.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Member
  • Topic Count:  0
  • Content Count:  8,722
  • Reputation:   992
  • Days Won:  23
  • Joined:  02/02/2005

all this is is espn keeping the one piece of ND that they can. their olympic sports. big deal. sure it hurts that it won't be part of our NBC deal and it will cost us some but it won't destroy the conference.

It will hurt our per team payout but it will still pay us a large increase over what we have not. Will it be a $17M per school agreement,no, but it will still be enough to remain competitive. I thikn we will end up around $12-$15M per school when the new TV deal is done. The problem is will it be high enough to warrant everyone giving up the rights? That I am not sure of.

TV will make us sign away our rights for the length of the contract. not a big deal IMO.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Member
  • Topic Count:  0
  • Content Count:  8,722
  • Reputation:   992
  • Days Won:  23
  • Joined:  02/02/2005

Just watched Brett McM and some other guy on Outside the Lines. Brett said that the ACC has language in their deal with ESPN that would allow for them to get a bump up from their $17 in the current contract. Neither Brett nor the other guy see Big 12 adding teams. The crux of the argument is that there is no one (Brett mentioned L'ville) that the Big 12 could add that would raise the Per Team dollars. So adding L'ville, USF, Cinci, Rutgers or whoever, while increasing total revenue for the conference, would dilute the per team take. Makes sense to me. I think any chance, and not a big one at that, of a Big 12 entry passed with Lee Roy Selmon.

I think shuffling is done. people keep saying conferences will go to 16. it would only mean less payout per team if they did. only big 12 makes some sense to get to 12 for champ game but that would also decrease payout per team as champ game is only worth $15M or so. they would need 2 teams to add another $25M+ just to break even. I think Texas would rather stay at 10. easier to make playoffs and no more money at 12.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Member
  • Topic Count:  0
  • Content Count:  511
  • Reputation:   20
  • Days Won:  1
  • Joined:  12/19/2006

all this is is espn keeping the one piece of ND that they can. their olympic sports. big deal. sure it hurts that it won't be part of our NBC deal and it will cost us some but it won't destroy the conference.

It will hurt our per team payout but it will still pay us a large increase over what we have not. Will it be a $17M per school agreement,no, but it will still be enough to remain competitive. I thikn we will end up around $12-$15M per school when the new TV deal is done. The problem is will it be high enough to warrant everyone giving up the rights? That I am not sure of.

TV will make us sign away our rights for the length of the contract. not a big deal IMO.

Dead on.....here:http://espn.go.com/blog/bigeast/post/_/id/36413/lucrative-big-east-deal-possible-without-nd Andrea nailed it. It will hurt but not kills us. ACC said they are not adding anyone else. This was a strategic move to reopen negotiations on their TV contract.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Tell a friend

    Love TheBullsPen.com? Tell a friend!
  • South Florida Fight Song

     

  • Pick All Before First Game Standings

    1. 1
      30
      Larry
    2. 1
      30
      BullyPulpit
      BullyPulpit
      View picks
    3. 1
      30
      MSBulls
      MSBulls
      View picks
    4. 1
      30
      USF_Bullsharks
      USF_Bullsharks
      View picks
    5. 1
      30
      Bob Loblaw
      Bob Loblaw
      View picks
  • usf-logo2.jpg
    Opponent Message Boards
    "Let them know you're from The Bulls Pen"

    Recommend one

     

    vs Bethune (8/31)

    at Alabama (9/7)  
    TideFans (I)
    TDAlabama (I)

    at So. Miss (9/14)

    vs Miami (9/21)
    Canes Insight (I)
    Miami-Hurricanes (I)

    at Tulane (09/28)
    Ye Olde Green wave (I)

    vs. Memphis (10/11)
    Tigers' Lair (R)

    vs. UAB (10/19) 
    Blazer Talk (CSN)

    at FAU (11/1)
    The Owl's Nest (I)

    vs Navy (11/9)

    at Charlotte (11/16)
    Niner Nation (I)

    at Rice (11/30) 

  • Quotes

    With the climate going on in NCAA athletics, you’re either moving forward at a hard pace or you’re not. I think what intrigued me the most is they’re very determined to become a big player nationally.

    Mitch Hannahs  

  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      lizbestofficial
      lizbestofficial earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      lizbestofficial
      lizbestofficial earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Rookie
      FlowerPower9
      FlowerPower9 went up a rank
      Rookie
    • Rookie
      LeavittAlone
      LeavittAlone went up a rank
      Rookie
    • Reacting Well
      LeavittAlone
      LeavittAlone earned a badge
      Reacting Well
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      Rocky Style
      Rocky Style
      115
    2. 2
      Bull Matrix
      Bull Matrix
      81
    3. 3
      Triple B
      Triple B
      80
    4. 4
      Brad
      Brad
      63
    5. 5
      John Lewis
      John Lewis
      61
  • Quotes

    Valiant efforts are for losers, moral victories are for losers. That’s what losers say. Winners win.

    Alex Golesh  

×
×
  • Create New...