Rushing the field

[ksquire]

I could be wrong Puc, but I believe it's customary to put the phrase you are quoting above what you are saying...

[puc86]

You're wrong, I go below no one.

I could be wrong Puc, but I believe it's customary to put the phrase you are quoting above what you are saying...

[puc86]

The whole "quote from _____" and the off color box around the text kind of gives away the fact that you are responding to someone else's post.  At least it does for those of us that are not "special".

[Guest]

Except that...

The whole "quote from _____" and the off color box around the text kind of gives away the fact that you are responding to someone else's post.  At least it does for those of us that are not "special".

... most people follow the conversation... QUOTE -> RESPONSE... QUOTE -> RESPONSE...

your posts are like reading a chain of emails... you have to read from the bottom up.

[puc86]

I am sorry I could not follow that because you went response-> quote ->response :

Except that...

The whole "quote from _____" and the off color box around the text kind of gives away the fact that you are responding to someone else's post.  At least it does for those of us that are not "special".

... most people follow the conversation... QUOTE -> RESPONSE... QUOTE -> RESPONSE...

your posts are like reading a chain of emails... you have to read from the bottom up.

[Guest]

I have no problem following you... and you are always free to do as you see fit... but out of almost 3,000 users on this board, you are the only one who does this...

I am sorry I could not follow that because you went response-> quote ->response :

Except that...

The whole "quote from _____" and the off color box around the text kind of gives away the fact that you are responding to someone else's post.  At least it does for those of us that are not "special".

... most people follow the conversation... QUOTE -> RESPONSE... QUOTE -> RESPONSE...

your posts are like reading a chain of emails... you have to read from the bottom up.

Of course, sometimes people make a mistake and put their response inside the quote from another user....  ;D    ;D 

[CowbellBandit]

As the man with his arm around Hall in the above picture (the tall guy), I can say that rushing the field, while exhilarating, should be reserved for only the biggest of wins, lest we look like we're small-time. Louisville was great for three reasons- 1) It was a home game (rushes should only be done on the home field, I don't think there are any exceptions save bowl games), 2) it was the biggest win in history (taking down a top ten!!), and 3) it was an absolute slaughter. We didn't just win, we owned. We reigned. We ruled. That being said, we need to set our sights high- I vote the next rush of the field be our first BCS clinching win, or the BCS win itself.

The big schools only rush on big wins- we're a big school, so we need to act like it.

And who the hell suggested we rush the field after beating that women's school in the middle of the state? Please, we need to treat them like the trumped-up 1-AA they are.

[bull2saintleo]

And who the hell suggested we rush the field after beating that women's school in the middle of the state? Please, we need to treat them like the trumped-up 1-AA they are.

I thought F$U was the former women's school, was UF as well???

[BoozedUpBull]

I like taking the Pirate ship, especially if someone's got a USF flag to hang from it. It'll serve an additional purpose of covering up some RED if it's after the defeat of Loovul.

Raise the flag.  I like that idea!

[CowbellBandit]

I was talking about UCF, actually. While they may not officially be a women's school, I've never met anyone who went there that I'd call a "man."