USF Among the Best Athletic Departments in the US in 2024

[Jim Johnson]

10 minutes ago, puc86 said:

You are right I love arguing about nothing and I would find it almost impossible to argue there has been any athletic success under MK. 

ANY? 

Winning a few conference championships over the years doesn't count?

[puc86]

1 minute ago, Jim Johnson said:

ANY? 

Winning a few conference championships over the years doesn't count?

I do not follow women’s Tiddlywinks or men’s mall speed walking  but I’m glad they do it for you.

[belgianbull]

Last year we were 7-6 and didn't win against a team with a winning record. Good year in basketball but still failed to go to the NCAAT.

These are the two sports that matter, and in no world are we deserving of this award.

 

 

[puc86]

1 minute ago, belgianbull said:

Last year we were 7-6 and didn't win against a team with a winning record. Good year in basketball but still failed to go to the NCAAT.

These are the two sports that matter, and in no world are we deserving of this award.

 

 

We are definitely deserving, we filled the entire thing out, that’s the criteria 

Edited 11 hours ago by puc86

[Bull Matrix]

Just now, puc86 said:

I do not follow women’s Tiddlywinks or men’s mall speed walking  but I’m glad they do it for you.

Man, you are not having a good time with this thread are you? Basically I have been trying to tell you to save you time that MK is not the issue with USF Athletics. As a matter of fact he is playing a big role in positioning USF to the promise land…,,

[puc86]

Just now, Bull Matrix said:

Man, you are not having a good time with this thread are you? Basically I have been trying to tell you to save you time that MK is not the issue with USF Athletics. As a matter of fact he is playing a big role in positioning USF to the promise land…,,

He continues to spend more money to achieve less, he may have a future in the us government but he doesn’t have one here. He has provided nothing of value and there is not sense in raising more money if you just spend it frivolously.

[Bull Matrix]

2 minutes ago, belgianbull said:

Last year we were 7-6 and didn't win against a team with a winning record. Good year in basketball but still failed to go to the NCAAT.

These are the two sports that matter, and in no world are we deserving of this award.

 

 

7-6 and mens hoops NIT bid along with the AAC regular season championship is not a bad start by both these coaches for their 1st season at USF. Both are home run hires. 

1 minute ago, puc86 said:

He continues to spend more money to achieve less, he may have a future in the us government but he doesn’t have one here. He has provided nothing of value and there is not sense in raising more money if you just spend it frivolously.

This is not true 

[puc86]

3 minutes ago, Bull Matrix said:

7-6 and mens hoops NIT bid along with the AAC regular season championship is not a bad start by both these coaches for their 1st season at USF. Both are home run hires. 

This is not true 

It most certainly is, those are facts and facts do in fact matter 

[Bull Matrix]

2 minutes ago, puc86 said:

It most certainly is, those are facts and facts do in fact matter 

Yes i agree with you that both CAG & CAAR are home run hires made by MK. Thank you!  Go Bulls!!

[SilverBull]

While I will concede that there are a lot of ways to define a successful collegiate athletics department, if winning consistently at the most high-profile sports is part of the criteria, we have whiffed on that one.