Jump to content

Early Signing Day - USF Athletics (Conversation Thread)


E.T.

Recommended Posts


  • Group:  TBP Subscriber III
  • Topic Count:  1,836
  • Content Count:  5,592
  • Reputation:   1,906
  • Days Won:  13
  • Joined:  12/02/2018

Quote

Jim actually started it out this morning and was hoping he'd keep it going but he apparently has a life ....

@Triple B - I would have, but had some meetings at work and when I saw you picking up the baton I figured I would let you run with it. 🙂

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Member
  • Topic Count:  148
  • Content Count:  19,617
  • Reputation:   6,287
  • Days Won:  255
  • Joined:  10/13/2002

3 minutes ago, BullyPulpit said:

This was a great day for the Bulls and CJS. I think time will show that our transfers were significantly under-ranked and that their HS rankings were more indicative of their abilities. If they were assigned their HS rankings, we would be looking at the #2 class in the AAC. Congratulations to all of the new Bulls! Show out on the field and in the classroom! 

If they were performing at the HS rankings how many would be transferring?

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  TBP Subscriber III
  • Topic Count:  370
  • Content Count:  6,587
  • Reputation:   2,014
  • Days Won:  37
  • Joined:  02/02/2005

Just now, puc86 said:

If they were performing at the HS rankings how many would be transferring?

Some of them couldn't quite crack the 2 deep because teams like Clemson and UNC have quite a bit of talent. Give your constant barrage of negativity a break for one day. 

  • Upvote 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Moderator
  • Topic Count:  1,641
  • Content Count:  75,958
  • Reputation:   11,737
  • Days Won:  436
  • Joined:  11/25/2005

1 minute ago, Jim Johnson said:

@Triple B - I would have, but had some meetings at work and when I saw you picking up the baton I figured I would let you run with it. 🙂

Thanks for getting it going ... Should have checked to see if you were back around and handed it back off. I've accomplished even less today than usual.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Member
  • Topic Count:  148
  • Content Count:  19,617
  • Reputation:   6,287
  • Days Won:  255
  • Joined:  10/13/2002

1 minute ago, BullyPulpit said:

Some of them couldn't quite crack the 2 deep because teams like Clemson and UNC have quite a bit of talent. Give your constant barrage of negativity a break for one day. 

I don’t think that’s a negative take, I think it’s a valid reason for a change in ranking. Had they came in and flourished I’m sure their ranking would have went up for a transfer but if they didn’t that has to factor someway as well. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  TBP Subscriber III
  • Topic Count:  1,836
  • Content Count:  5,592
  • Reputation:   1,906
  • Days Won:  13
  • Joined:  12/02/2018

1 minute ago, Triple B said:

Thanks for getting it going ... Should have checked to see if you were back around and handed it back off. I've accomplished even less today than usual.

Same for me... too busy watching Twitter and the USF boards.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  TBP Subscriber III
  • Topic Count:  4,799
  • Content Count:  38,276
  • Reputation:   2,660
  • Days Won:  29
  • Joined:  12/24/2001

CJS saying that Canes were putting a hard push on for Gordon from MN. Said that as soon as he entered the portal, he flew up to MN and had dinner with him.

  • Go Bulls! 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  TBP Subscriber III
  • Topic Count:  370
  • Content Count:  6,587
  • Reputation:   2,014
  • Days Won:  37
  • Joined:  02/02/2005

Just now, puc86 said:

I don’t think that’s a negative take, I think it’s a valid reason for a change in ranking. Had they came in and flourished I’m sure their ranking would have went up for a transfer but if they didn’t that has to factor someway as well. 

Some of them didn't get to play and were downgraded as a result with zero film. For instance, I don't think Michael Dukes should have received the ratings deduction that he got. It isn't like he failed to perform when given the chance. He had 42 carries for 212 yards and 2 TDs at Clemson. I could understand a reduction if he went out and fumbled a bunch or only averaged 3 ypc, but, when given the chance, he produced there. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  TBP Subscriber III
  • Topic Count:  4,799
  • Content Count:  38,276
  • Reputation:   2,660
  • Days Won:  29
  • Joined:  12/24/2001

gousfbulls.com updated with the 23 players.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  TBP Subscriber III
  • Topic Count:  4,799
  • Content Count:  38,276
  • Reputation:   2,660
  • Days Won:  29
  • Joined:  12/24/2001

1 minute ago, E.T. said:

gousfbulls.com updated with the 23 players.

Newsome will make 24.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...