Jump to content

Conference realignment "Rumors" "tweets" "etc"


Bulls1181

Recommended Posts


  • Group:  Member
  • Topic Count:  150
  • Content Count:  19,395
  • Reputation:   6,097
  • Days Won:  233
  • Joined:  01/13/2011

10 minutes ago, 2000bull said:

What was the final count on the thread?

3,945 posts. 264 pages.

 

I was guessing on the numbers when I made that joke. He'll be hard-pressed to top 4,000 career yards.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Moderator
  • Topic Count:  1,641
  • Content Count:  75,989
  • Reputation:   11,751
  • Days Won:  436
  • Joined:  11/25/2005

Just took a quick peek over there and I nominate the 2nd post in the thread for HOF:

With Eveld, Floyd, and the addition of Cameron, it would be hard for him to crack the lineup.  I'm actually surprised we're already offering 2013 QBs.  Perhaps we don't desperately need to recruit a QB for the 2013 class.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Admin
  • Topic Count:  13,428
  • Content Count:  98,389
  • Reputation:   11,614
  • Days Won:  491
  • Joined:  05/19/2000

Holtz drunk posting again. 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Member
  • Topic Count:  411
  • Content Count:  19,536
  • Reputation:   996
  • Days Won:  24
  • Joined:  09/01/2006

2 hours ago, Brad said:

You guys intent on corrupting the datadase? :)

Yep.  And also the database. :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Member
  • Topic Count:  18
  • Content Count:  8,878
  • Reputation:   1,266
  • Days Won:  28
  • Joined:  07/12/2013

37 minutes ago, Triple B said:

Just took a quick peek over there and I nominate the 2nd post in the thread for HOF:

With Eveld, Floyd, and the addition of Cameron, it would be hard for him to crack the lineup.  I'm actually surprised we're already offering 2013 QBs.  Perhaps we don't desperately need to recruit a QB for the 2013 class.

Thanks for the laugh, that's an epic :facepalm: post.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Member
  • Topic Count:  37
  • Content Count:  431
  • Reputation:   35
  • Days Won:  0
  • Joined:  09/11/2006

5 hours ago, Triple B said:

Just took a quick peek over there and I nominate the 2nd post in the thread for HOF:

With Eveld, Floyd, and the addition of Cameron, it would be hard for him to crack the lineup.  I'm actually surprised we're already offering 2013 QBs.  Perhaps we don't desperately need to recruit a QB for the 2013 class.

I think you found the post that jinxed our QB situation for a while.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Member
  • Topic Count:  39
  • Content Count:  2,263
  • Reputation:   1,026
  • Days Won:  6
  • Joined:  09/14/2007

19 hours ago, Triple B said:

Just took a quick peek over there and I nominate the 2nd post in the thread for HOF:

With Eveld, Floyd, and the addition of Cameron, it would be hard for him to crack the lineup.  I'm actually surprised we're already offering 2013 QBs.  Perhaps we don't desperately need to recruit a QB for the 2013 class.

Who knew The Onion writers were bulls fans?  

I mean, someone wrote this in jest right?

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Member
  • Topic Count:  263
  • Content Count:  24,750
  • Reputation:   3,107
  • Days Won:  87
  • Joined:  12/15/2009

21 hours ago, JTrue said:

3,945 posts. 264 pages.

 

I was guessing on the numbers when I made that joke. He'll be hard-pressed to top 4,000 career yards.

He may be lucky to get 264 passing yards.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Member
  • Topic Count:  263
  • Content Count:  24,750
  • Reputation:   3,107
  • Days Won:  87
  • Joined:  12/15/2009

21 hours ago, Triple B said:

Just took a quick peek over there and I nominate the 2nd post in the thread for HOF:

With Eveld, Floyd, and the addition of Cameron, it would be hard for him to crack the lineup.  I'm actually surprised we're already offering 2013 QBs.  Perhaps we don't desperately need to recruit a QB for the 2013 class.

Can't. Stop. Laughing. And. Crying.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Member
  • Topic Count:  1,518
  • Content Count:  42,125
  • Reputation:   8,834
  • Days Won:  344
  • Joined:  11/29/2009

From Dodd's article:
Several industry sources told CBS Sports it is unlikely there is enough money in the system to make Big 12 expansion worthwhile. The league might get a slight bump in rights fees but not a windfall. In essence: ESPN already owns the majority of media rights for the likes of, say, BYU and Cincinnati. Why would it pay more for the pair to play in the Big 12?

The conversation may be shifting away from expansion and toward a conference championship game. Because of recent NCAA legislation, there is no reason for the Big 12 to expand to stage a championship game. It can do so with only 10 teams.
http://mweb.cbssports.com/ncaaf/writer/d...ing-big-12

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...