Jump to content

Conference realignment "Rumors" "tweets" "etc"

Bulls1181

By Bulls1181
in USF South Florida Bulls Athletics

 Share

Recommended Posts

belgianbull Toro Magnifico

belgianbull

Posted
  • Group:  Member
  • Topic Count:  0
  • Content Count:  2,340
  • Reputation:   1,210
  • Days Won:  10
  • Joined:  12/02/2022
Posted
1 minute ago, Brad said:

Precisely, what's the GUARANTEED payout?   Another lovely tweet from earlier today states they had no TV deal.

Fair question. However one can assume that after the current AAC contract runs out the next contract will be way less without SMU, UCF, Cincy, Houston, and even less so without Memphis, UTSA, and Tulane.

You have to assume that the new PAC compared to the new AAC will be a bigger payout if Memphis and Tulane jump.

 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
  • Replies 44.7k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Bull Matrix

    2733

  • Triple B

    2596

  • Rocky Style

    2076

  • Cat941

    1566

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Popular Posts

aroth
aroth

I checked his account, and it all looks like unbiased objective statements to me. 

MaltLiquorBull
MaltLiquorBull

Eventually all of this greed will decimate the national fanbase.  The more exclusive they make the national championship process, the less fans they will have.  I am a USF fan, and I'm not going to pi

DontPushMe
DontPushMe

Everyone involved in managing our pathetic program over the past 10 years should be fired out of a cannon into the bay. 

Posted Images

M50_BULL Mentor

M50_BULL

Posted
  • Group:  Member
  • Topic Count:  28
  • Content Count:  864
  • Reputation:   489
  • Days Won:  1
  • Joined:  09/20/2012
Posted
4 minutes ago, Brad said:

Precisely, what's the GUARANTEED payout?   Another lovely tweet from earlier today states they had no TV deal.

Well currently the guaranteed payout is to not spend the rest of eternity in AAC hell playing with our CLT...

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Brad Toro Magnifico

Brad

Posted
  • Group:  Admin
  • Topic Count:  13,429
  • Content Count:  98,415
  • Reputation:   11,621
  • Days Won:  491
  • Joined:  05/19/2000
Posted
1 minute ago, belgianbull said:

You have to assume that the new PAC compared to the new AAC will be a bigger payout if Memphis and Tulane jump.

You don't have to assume anything.  Let's see what the market is for these teams/matchups.  It may be less than the old AAC too.  

Remember, the best the old PAC12 could get was a subscriber-based deal from Apple and that was before they broke up.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites
MMW Grand Bull

MMW

Posted
  • Group:  Member
  • Topic Count:  39
  • Content Count:  2,266
  • Reputation:   1,027
  • Days Won:  6
  • Joined:  09/14/2007
Posted (edited)
30 minutes ago, belgianbull said:

If the PAC was really smart they would add all the service academies ( Air Force, Navy, and Army) and UNLV as well as USF, UTSA Memphis, Tulane, and ECU.

Could have East West division

West: WSU,OSU, Boise State, Fresno State, CSU,  UNLV, San Diego State, Air Force

East: USF, Tulane, ,Memphis, Army, Navy, ECU, UTSA, and one more

That would be palatable at least.

 

Edited by MMW
Link to comment
Share on other sites
aroth Community Regular

aroth

Posted
  • Group:  Member
  • Topic Count:  0
  • Content Count:  233
  • Reputation:   261
  • Days Won:  1
  • Joined:  07/28/2013
Posted

I think it’s fair to assume the new PAC will get more than the AAC in TV money. The problem is the buyout and potential long term commitment. 

If Memphis and Tulane are leaving for the PAC it really puts us in a tough spot.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Jim Johnson Toro Magnifico

Jim Johnson

Posted
  • Group:  TBP Subscriber III
  • Topic Count:  1,836
  • Content Count:  5,608
  • Reputation:   1,911
  • Days Won:  13
  • Joined:  12/02/2018
Posted

We're staying!
 

 

  • Go Bulls! 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
79 Bull Toro Magnifico

79 Bull

Posted
  • Group:  TBP Subscriber III
  • Topic Count:  699
  • Content Count:  7,907
  • Reputation:   1,351
  • Days Won:  6
  • Joined:  07/10/2003
Posted
3 minutes ago, Jim Johnson said:

We're staying!
 

 

I hope the "commitment" is to not go to the PAC at this time.  We better not be signing some GOR or iron clad agreement to stay for the next 5 years.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
00Bull Proficient

00Bull

Posted
  • Group:  Member
  • Topic Count:  2
  • Content Count:  649
  • Reputation:   324
  • Days Won:  0
  • Joined:  09/08/2021
Posted (edited)
6 minutes ago, Jim Johnson said:

We're staying!
 

 

This wouldn’t be the worst case scenario, so that’s good.

Edited by 00Bull
Link to comment
Share on other sites
belgianbull Toro Magnifico

belgianbull

Posted
  • Group:  Member
  • Topic Count:  0
  • Content Count:  2,340
  • Reputation:   1,210
  • Days Won:  10
  • Joined:  12/02/2022
Posted
6 minutes ago, Jim Johnson said:

We're staying!
 

 

What does the P-E stand for? 

If that's the case we better go hard after Air Force?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Brad Toro Magnifico

Brad

Posted
  • Group:  Admin
  • Topic Count:  13,429
  • Content Count:  98,415
  • Reputation:   11,621
  • Days Won:  491
  • Joined:  05/19/2000
Posted

Next thread size driver is up!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing
×
×
  • Create New...