Conference realignment "Rumors" "tweets" "etc"

[MMW]

1 minute ago, Rocky Style said:

Would we if we were in the ACC?  

yea, we only fill half (55.72%) of Ray Jay.  Duke and NC are below us.

[CF is NFL Jr]

3 minutes ago, Rocky Style said:

Hmm I wonder how valuable they are really compared to some others.  It's not the 90s.

The are the most valuable program outside of the P2.  Stronger than Clemson even with their more recent success.  If the P2 could kick out the dead weight to take FSU they would  

[USF_Bullsharks]

When OCS is built we will be at or near 100% capacity every game. I also think Georgia Tech's stadium is under construction, but can't remember if that reduced seating capacity in the interim. If it did, then their 55k stadium capacity should be reduced. Either way, this weekend will boost our %. 

[John Lewis]

What would our capacity be if it were in the OCS (35,000)?

We're a bit hamstrung by using 65,000 of RJS. What if you used the 41,000 of the lower bowl?

[Rocky Style]

3 minutes ago, MMW said:

yea, we only fill half (55.72%) of Ray Jay.  Duke and NC are below us.

That's a weird stat.  It's like during covid when they only reported either the percentage or raw number to fit the manipulation narrative at the time, but rarely both at the same time.  You have to show both the total capacity and the percentage to understand what it means.

[Bull Matrix]

No to PAC for USF

[Rocky Style]

6 minutes ago, Bull Matrix said:

No to PAC for USF

FSU is not looking too hot right now.  So far they have demanded a playoff spot and lost by 60 and demanded to be in the SEC and lost to everyone.

[MMW]

14 minutes ago, Bull Matrix said:

No to PAC for USF

 

I am inclined to agree but who is Sean and what does the twitter article say?

Edited Tuesday at 01:25 PM by MMW
typo

[belgianbull]

20 minutes ago, Bull Matrix said:

No to PAC for USF

I dont buy the "if FSU leaves the ACC that we are guaranteed a spot" in the ACC thing.

It helps us but there are no guarantees

If Memphis and Tulane go to the Pac, and we are invited as well; it would be foolish (in my opinion) to just think that the ACC is  guaranteed for us and that we are too good for the PAC. It would also be foolish ( imo) to think that a depleted AAC without UConn, Cincy, UCF, Houston, SMU, Memphis, and Tulane would be a better place to be than the new PAC.

Edited Tuesday at 01:31 PM by belgianbull

[MMW]

4 minutes ago, belgianbull said:

I dont buy the "if FSU leaves the ACC that we are guaranteed a spot" in the ACC thing.

It helps us but there are no guarantees

If Memphis and Tulane go to the Pac, and we are invited as well; it would be foolish (in my opinion) to just think that the ACC is  guaranteed for us and that we are too good for the PAC. It would also be foolish ( imo) to think that a depleted AAC without UConn, Cincy, UCF, Houston, SMU, Memphis, and Tulane would be a better place to be than the new PAC.

I doubt we are just sitting on our hands and hoping for the best.