Conference realignment "Rumors" "tweets" "etc"

[Outlaw]

1 hour ago, CousinRicky said:

Yep. I missed the lol at the end.

Maybe we need to make a thread titled if you use sarcasm put lol at the end of the sentence.  

Edited October 18, 2023 by Outlaw

[Triple B]

5 hours ago, Rocky Style said:

Here's a guy I have not heard of riffing on the ACC vetting and GOR situation.

 

His podcast was discussed earlier this season. Was pretty much AAC centric but he's been talking about branching out into more G5 conferences, which coincides with him getting a sponsor ....... "Best U Mental Health Clinic".

[belgianbull]

13 minutes ago, Bull Matrix said:

But seriously as long as USF continues to build and grow the fanbase they will be a top choice imo.

But in order to build the fanbase you have to start winning. After losing 56-14 to FAU the fanbase is as demoralized as I have ever seen it. If in two years we are still underachieving while FAU, UAB, UTSA, Memphis, and Tulane are thriving, it wont be the last two that pass us, but others might as well. 

 

Edited October 18, 2023 by belgianbull

[Rocky Style]

33 minutes ago, belgianbull said:

it wont be the last two that pass us, but others might as well. 

We could be the John Stockton for other sports programs.

Edited October 18, 2023 by Rocky Style

[TallyBull]

37 minutes ago, Triple B said:

His podcast was discussed earlier this season. Was pretty much AAC centric but he's been talking about branching out into more G5 conferences, which coincides with him getting a sponsor ....... "Best U Mental Health Clinic".

I've been getting less and less interested in this pod over time. Not sure if that's because of USF's lack of success recently, or his Texas-centric takes/interests. Possibly both. If he's also branching out into other G5 conferences... meh. I only care about the AAC because I have to. 

Edited October 18, 2023 by TallyBull

[Mission9]

43 minutes ago, Triple B said:

The ACC currently has no automatic bid, if you’re referring to the playoffs. 

Your point had me think of another. If one complains that USF is not in an "automatic bid" conference on one hand and then states a conference accepting USF would be marginalized on another , a what is their exact position? What does it all mean? 

[Rocky Style]

3 minutes ago, Mission9 said:

Your point had me think of another. If one complains that USF is not in an "automatic bid" conference on one hand and then states a conference accepting USF would be marginalized on another , a what is their exact position? What does it all mean? 

At that point go where the money is, which is not here.

[Bull Matrix]

1 hour ago, Outlaw said:

Maybe we need to make a thread titled if you use sarcasm put lol at the end of the sentence.  

We could do that or use the following…,

[BDYZR]

56 minutes ago, Bull Matrix said:

We could do that or use the following…,

 = sarcasm

[Peatearpan]

1 hour ago, TallyBull said:

I've been getting less and less interested in this pod over time. Not sure if that's because of USF's lack of success recently, or his Texas-centric takes/interests. Possibly both. If he's also branching out into other G5 conferences... meh. I only care about the AAC because I have to. 

Same here. He does a lot of “I was right, I told you this was going to happen” and it is legit him just quoting some other tweet guy as his source.

I will say, he has had interviews with Aresco and the MWC commissioner