Jump to content

Conference realignment "Rumors" "tweets" "etc"


Bulls1181

Recommended Posts


  • Group:  Member
  • Topic Count:  609
  • Content Count:  17,071
  • Reputation:   3,255
  • Days Won:  46
  • Joined:  01/04/2003

51 minutes ago, puc86 said:

Especially if you also tossed in some NY6 prime time bowls in exchange for Weed Wacker early December Monday morning bowls…

Exactly. What it tells us is that USF has not even come close to reaching their potential yet. Maybe CAG can help USF start getting there. We shall see 

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Member
  • Topic Count:  609
  • Content Count:  17,071
  • Reputation:   3,255
  • Days Won:  46
  • Joined:  01/04/2003

We have been saying that it would be best for FSU & ACC in the long run to reach a settlement…

0774E342-37F0-4108-B9C3-41C8855F3FB4.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  TBP Subscriber III
  • Topic Count:  586
  • Content Count:  23,144
  • Reputation:   6,114
  • Days Won:  109
  • Joined:  09/13/2007

Those viewing numbers were from 15 - 19.  Pretty sure they are worse from there forward to the present.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Member
  • Topic Count:  609
  • Content Count:  17,071
  • Reputation:   3,255
  • Days Won:  46
  • Joined:  01/04/2003

12 minutes ago, CousinRicky said:

Those viewing numbers were from 15 - 19.  Pretty sure they are worse from there forward to the present.

Yes and I do believe those years were post Big East BCS days. I do believe tons of people lost interest with USF after they got left out of the power conferences. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Member
  • Topic Count:  11
  • Content Count:  270
  • Reputation:   68
  • Days Won:  1
  • Joined:  04/24/2008

38 minutes ago, Bull Matrix said:

We have been saying that it would be best for FSU & ACC in the long run to reach a settlement…

0774E342-37F0-4108-B9C3-41C8855F3FB4.png

Within the coming weeks FSU and Clemson will sue over the grant of rights and then will announce their departure shortly after. 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Member
  • Topic Count:  117
  • Content Count:  22,701
  • Reputation:   5,362
  • Days Won:  53
  • Joined:  09/14/2007

That's when we slide into the ACC DMs

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Member
  • Topic Count:  133
  • Content Count:  4,089
  • Reputation:   1,310
  • Days Won:  5
  • Joined:  07/28/2023

7 hours ago, Gismo said:

Here is actual viewership data from 2015-2019. This shows why UCF got a Big12 invite over USF, more views. 

Here the ranks from UCF down:

  1. UCF (566K)
  2. Memphis (564K)
  3. Arizona (561K)
  4. Kentucky (484K)
  5. Boise State (476K)
  6. Vanderbilt (438K)
  7. Cincinnati (430K)
  8. Duke (410K)
  9. USF (407K)
  10. Boston College (403K)
  11. Illinois (401K)
  12. Wake Forest (398K)
  13. Temple (354K)
  14. Kansas (346K)
  15. Oregon State (295K)
  16. Rutgers (266K)
  17. Tulsa (265K)
  18. SMU (232K)
  19. Colorado State (130K)
  20. Fresno State (127K)
  21. Wyoming (126K)
  22. Air Force (121K)
  23. New Mexico (97K)
  24. Hawaii (94K)
  25. East Carolina (82K)
  26. Nevada (80K)
  27. San Diego State (63K)
  28. UNLV (55K)
  29. Tulane (42K)
  30. San Jose State (30K)
MEDIUM.COM

TV viewership isn’t always the best way to measure a college football...

 

Look at SMU.  Added to ACC.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Moderator
  • Topic Count:  1,641
  • Content Count:  75,942
  • Reputation:   11,726
  • Days Won:  436
  • Joined:  11/25/2005

7 hours ago, Gismo said:

Here is actual viewership data from 2015-2019. This shows why UCF got a Big12 invite over USF, more views. 

No, it doesn’t. From the article, “I don’t find TV viewership numbers to be a good way to measure value for a few reasons”

150K per game is nothing in the overall scheme of things. They got it over us because of their winning/conf championships, bottom line. 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Moderator
  • Topic Count:  1,641
  • Content Count:  75,942
  • Reputation:   11,726
  • Days Won:  436
  • Joined:  11/25/2005

Something to remember on this ACC thing. FSU, Clemson and UNC leaving will not necessarily trigger adding more teams. They’ve already got 3 coming to replace them and keep them at the same number if those do leave. 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Member
  • Topic Count:  9,900
  • Content Count:  66,123
  • Reputation:   2,453
  • Days Won:  172
  • Joined:  01/01/2001

2 hours ago, Bull Matrix said:

We have been saying that it would be best for FSU & ACC in the long run to reach a settlement…

0774E342-37F0-4108-B9C3-41C8855F3FB4.png

they are getting cherry picked

47 minutes ago, Cat941 said:

Look at SMU.  Added to ACC.  

because they waived yearly fees

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...