Jump to content

Conference realignment "Rumors" "tweets" "etc"


Bulls1181

Recommended Posts


  • Group:  Member
  • Topic Count:  179
  • Content Count:  3,674
  • Reputation:   479
  • Days Won:  4
  • Joined:  02/01/2005

2 hours ago, Jim Johnson said:

Apple did not "let them walk" -- the tech company was simply not going to guarantee a number that would satisfy Oregon and Washington to move to all-streaming (or at least "streaming first") contracts.

Plus, let's not forget that Larry Scott promised a similar "tiered" package for the Pac 12 networks that never came true.  So Oregon, Washington, and others were in the mindset of "fool me twice..."

 

Fool Me Once GIFs | Tenor

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Member
  • Topic Count:  0
  • Content Count:  62
  • Reputation:   15
  • Days Won:  0
  • Joined:  07/07/2023

5 hours ago, Peatearpan said:

I mean, I would get the subscription just for the season. I have also never seen Ted Lasso, so I could finally watch that as well.

FYI.........Apple TV+ is NOT required at all to access MLS Season Pass. MLS Season Pass is a completely separate subscription and available as a standalone product..........It would be assumed that CFB will work the same way

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Member
  • Topic Count:  23
  • Content Count:  3,769
  • Reputation:   1,269
  • Days Won:  14
  • Joined:  01/19/2011

If true (have no idea) then I’m much less interested in going to the PAC. Seems to me we only make the jump if Stanford and Cal are also part of this, because that’s the only way we can be assured the new PAC will remain P5 with an auto bid to the CFB. I doubt the other conferences would cut Stanford and Cal out entirely.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  TBP Subscriber
  • Topic Count:  89
  • Content Count:  13,812
  • Reputation:   3,842
  • Days Won:  30
  • Joined:  10/16/2017

When is papa luck coming to Tampa ? He visited Fau...

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  TBP Subscriber III
  • Topic Count:  1,761
  • Content Count:  17,690
  • Reputation:   1,338
  • Days Won:  13
  • Joined:  08/16/2004

19 minutes ago, Outlaw said:

When is papa luck coming to Tampa ? He visited Fau...

We are behind FAU in Athletics. 

  • Crying 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Moderator
  • Topic Count:  1,641
  • Content Count:  75,958
  • Reputation:   11,737
  • Days Won:  436
  • Joined:  11/25/2005

24 minutes ago, Outlaw said:

When is papa luck coming to Tampa ? He visited Fau...

Logic says it’s safe to assume that visit was scheduled a good while before all this started. 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  TBP Subscriber III
  • Topic Count:  3
  • Content Count:  179
  • Reputation:   140
  • Days Won:  0
  • Joined:  09/16/2016

36 minutes ago, TallyBull said:

If true (have no idea) then I’m much less interested in going to the PAC. Seems to me we only make the jump if Stanford and Cal are also part of this, because that’s the only way we can be assured the new PAC will remain P5 with an auto bid to the CFB. I doubt the other conferences would cut Stanford and Cal out entirely.

 

Oh yeah. I'd be much, much less excited about the PAAC if it were sans-Cal/Stanford. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  TBP Subscriber III
  • Topic Count:  111
  • Content Count:  5,630
  • Reputation:   1,500
  • Days Won:  10
  • Joined:  09/18/2005

24 minutes ago, flsportsfan83 said:

We are behind FAU in Athletics. 

🤮

  • Crying 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Member
  • Topic Count:  28
  • Content Count:  855
  • Reputation:   487
  • Days Won:  1
  • Joined:  09/20/2012

Imagine if our last two coaches put in as much effort to not sucking and winning some **** football games as we do on this realignment rumor thread. We'd be in the B10 by now...

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Member
  • Topic Count:  411
  • Content Count:  5,595
  • Reputation:   206
  • Days Won:  3
  • Joined:  12/10/2006

30 minutes ago, Triple B said:

Logic says it’s safe to assume that visit was scheduled a good while before all this started. 

Logic? You want to bring logic into a 3000+ page thread?!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...