Jump to content
  • USF Bulls fans join us at The Bulls Pen

    It's simple, free and connects you to other South Florida Bulls fans!

  • Members do not see this ad, Register

Anchor Down?


Recommended Posts


  • Group:  Member
  • Topic Count:  410
  • Content Count:  19,525
  • Reputation:   992
  • Days Won:  24
  • Joined:  09/01/2006

 

 

Un-frackin-beLIEVable!

 

I was JUST now watching the replay on ESPN3, stepped outside to take the trash out to the truck as they were driving by, come back, and...

 

ESPN PULLED THE GAME FROM THE REPLAY LIST

 

My screen had nothing but an error page, when I reloaded the page, I got nothing but the SEC splash screen. Here's the link for proof.

 

http://espn.go.com/watchespn/player/_/id/1973105/size/condensed/

 

It's as if the game never happened. WTF ESPN??????

 

Apparently the SEC Network has rights to this game.

 

 

Like I said, I was in the middle of watching it when it got pulled. I saw Temple's first drive, then an error screen.

 

This isn't about TV rights, it's about embarassment!

 

I'm angry!

 

Thanks slick, for getting the word out.

 

 

Um, it is about TV rights.  If you go to WatchESPN for this game right now it says this is an SEC Network game.

 

I'm really at a loss trying to figure out what you are so upset about.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Member
  • Topic Count:  410
  • Content Count:  19,525
  • Reputation:   992
  • Days Won:  24
  • Joined:  09/01/2006

 

 

 

WTF? Can the AAC approve ours

Why would you want the AAC to approve our ridiculous idea? I hope they don't.

SEC network said the jersey was approved in April and later the commissioners met and decided against logos so what they presented was an email about their jerseys being ok, after they were told the contrast of the letters and jerseys weren't enough, they redid them, resubmitted and got an ok. But since then the rule changed. I think it's BS.

 

 

 

Its black on black so technically its not visible. 

 

That is the loop hole.

 

If we put white letters on a white jersey, or green letters on a green jersey then we could do it as well.

 

The fake names can't be visible.

 

 

One of you two is wrong. Any links to back up?

 

 

Names were "pre-approved" by the SEC, no loophole.  It'll be interesting to see if the NCAA weighs in.

 

http://www.al.com/sports/index.ssf/2014/08/penalty_overturned_as_vanderbi.html

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Member
  • Topic Count:  410
  • Content Count:  19,525
  • Reputation:   992
  • Days Won:  24
  • Joined:  09/01/2006

If you watch SEC Network, it's copyrighted ESPN. I included all the major sports news outlets when I tweeted the game was pulled. Maybe someone will pick it up.

 

Just because ESPN produced the game does not mean they have broadcast rights on all platforms.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Moderator
  • Topic Count:  1,612
  • Content Count:  74,566
  • Reputation:   10,836
  • Days Won:  423
  • Joined:  11/25/2005

 

 

 

 

WTF? Can the AAC approve ours

Why would you want the AAC to approve our ridiculous idea? I hope they don't.

SEC network said the jersey was approved in April and later the commissioners met and decided against logos so what they presented was an email about their jerseys being ok, after they were told the contrast of the letters and jerseys weren't enough, they redid them, resubmitted and got an ok. But since then the rule changed. I think it's BS.

 

 

 

Its black on black so technically its not visible. 

 

That is the loop hole.

 

If we put white letters on a white jersey, or green letters on a green jersey then we could do it as well.

 

The fake names can't be visible.

 

 

One of you two is wrong. Any links to back up?

 

 

Names were "pre-approved" by the SEC, no loophole.  It'll be interesting to see if the NCAA weighs in.

 

http://www.al.com/sports/index.ssf/2014/08/penalty_overturned_as_vanderbi.html

 

 

My bad. Not specific enough. I know they were pre-approved but just wanted to see some sort of timeline ...

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Member
  • Topic Count:  410
  • Content Count:  19,525
  • Reputation:   992
  • Days Won:  24
  • Joined:  09/01/2006

http://www.gatorzone.com/listings/sec-network-faq

 

  • I am an authenticated WatchESPN app user, will I be able to see SEC Network content through that app?

    SEC Network will be available through the WatchESPN app for cable, satellite or teleco providers with authenticated SEC Network access.

    Visit www.getsecnetwork.com for more information and to alert your provider of your interest in SEC Network content.

 

http://www.getsecnetwork.com/Default.asp?u=vanderbilt

BRIGHT HOUSE NETWORKS OFFERS THE SEC NETWORK ON CHANNEL 54 AND 1150 HD, OR ON THE ALTERNATE CHANNEL 530 OR 1191.
Bright House Networks subscribers are currently not able to access the SEC Network or SEC Network + on WatchESPN. Contact Bright House Networks for more information.
Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Member
  • Topic Count:  410
  • Content Count:  19,525
  • Reputation:   992
  • Days Won:  24
  • Joined:  09/01/2006

 

 

 

 

 

WTF? Can the AAC approve ours

Why would you want the AAC to approve our ridiculous idea? I hope they don't.

SEC network said the jersey was approved in April and later the commissioners met and decided against logos so what they presented was an email about their jerseys being ok, after they were told the contrast of the letters and jerseys weren't enough, they redid them, resubmitted and got an ok. But since then the rule changed. I think it's BS.

 

 

 

Its black on black so technically its not visible. 

 

That is the loop hole.

 

If we put white letters on a white jersey, or green letters on a green jersey then we could do it as well.

 

The fake names can't be visible.

 

 

One of you two is wrong. Any links to back up?

 

 

Names were "pre-approved" by the SEC, no loophole.  It'll be interesting to see if the NCAA weighs in.

 

http://www.al.com/sports/index.ssf/2014/08/penalty_overturned_as_vanderbi.html

 

 

My bad. Not specific enough. I know they were pre-approved but just wanted to see some sort of timeline ...

 

 

I read somewhere that the email for pre-approval was from April.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Moderator
  • Topic Count:  1,612
  • Content Count:  74,566
  • Reputation:   10,836
  • Days Won:  423
  • Joined:  11/25/2005

 

 

 

 

 

 

WTF? Can the AAC approve ours

Why would you want the AAC to approve our ridiculous idea? I hope they don't.

SEC network said the jersey was approved in April and later the commissioners met and decided against logos so what they presented was an email about their jerseys being ok, after they were told the contrast of the letters and jerseys weren't enough, they redid them, resubmitted and got an ok. But since then the rule changed. I think it's BS.

 

 

 

Its black on black so technically its not visible. 

 

That is the loop hole.

 

If we put white letters on a white jersey, or green letters on a green jersey then we could do it as well.

 

The fake names can't be visible.

 

 

One of you two is wrong. Any links to back up?

 

 

Names were "pre-approved" by the SEC, no loophole.  It'll be interesting to see if the NCAA weighs in.

 

http://www.al.com/sports/index.ssf/2014/08/penalty_overturned_as_vanderbi.html

 

 

My bad. Not specific enough. I know they were pre-approved but just wanted to see some sort of timeline ...

 

 

I read somewhere that the email for pre-approval was from April.  

 

 

No offense but .......   B)

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Member
  • Topic Count:  653
  • Content Count:  31,049
  • Reputation:   2,487
  • Days Won:  172
  • Joined:  08/30/2011

What part of "I WAS ALREADY WATCHING THE GAME" did you not understand?

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Moderator
  • Topic Count:  1,612
  • Content Count:  74,566
  • Reputation:   10,836
  • Days Won:  423
  • Joined:  11/25/2005

What part of "I WAS ALREADY WATCHING THE GAME" did you not understand?

 

I understood all that, why?

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Group:  Member
  • Topic Count:  653
  • Content Count:  31,049
  • Reputation:   2,487
  • Days Won:  172
  • Joined:  08/30/2011

 

What part of "I WAS ALREADY WATCHING THE GAME" did you not understand?

 

I understood all that, why?

 

 

Was responding to Shadow...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Tell a friend

    Love TheBullsPen.com? Tell a friend!
  • South Florida Fight Song

     

  • Quotes

    "Right now we’re not seeking perfection, we’re seeking progress.. and I’m seeing progress"

    Jeff Scott  

  • Files

  • Recent Achievements

  • Popular Contributors

  • Quotes

    "There is no inherent fear among this group of players. The fear of failing drove the program from day one - the fear of failing the coaches, the fan base, the university, each teammate, themselves. Now, as we head into the biggest game in our history at home on a national stage against the highest ranked team to step on OUR field, the players are taking an introspective look at themselves. Unfortunately, I don't know if they get it. They lack the fear."

    Terry Lucas, 09/26/22  

×
×
  • Create New...

It appears you are using ad blocking tools.  This site is supported through ads.  Please disable in order to enjoy full access to The Bulls Pen.  Registration is free and reduces ads.