#1
Posted 13 June 2012 - 07:03 AM
http://en.wikipedia....VA_Compass_Bowl
#2
Posted 13 June 2012 - 08:00 AM
#3
Posted 13 June 2012 - 08:12 AM
Edited by slick1ru2, 13 June 2012 - 08:15 AM.
#4
Posted 13 June 2012 - 08:25 AM
They're a decent team, on the rise, but far from a quality BCS squad. Quality BCS teams don't lose by 30 points three times in a year.
#5
Posted 13 June 2012 - 08:34 AM
Edited by slick1ru2, 13 June 2012 - 08:35 AM.
#6
Posted 13 June 2012 - 08:38 AM
Regardless of what you believe 7-6 Texas A&M to be, SMU lost by 30+ points three times.
#7
Posted 13 June 2012 - 09:10 AM
#8
Posted 13 June 2012 - 10:36 AM
Edited by slick1ru2, 13 June 2012 - 10:41 AM.
#9
Posted 15 June 2012 - 03:56 PM
Then, they laugh at you.
Then, they fight you.
Then, you win."
- Mohandas Karamchand Gandhi
#10
Posted 15 June 2012 - 04:27 PM
And USF got wrecked by that same Pitt team last year. What an embarrasing game to watch, and to add insult to injury, I watched it in 3D at Muvico.
I watched it in person. Very painful...
I've seen things you people wouldn't believe. ... Attack ships on fire off the shoulder of Orion. I watched c-beams glitter in the dark near the Tannhäuser Gate. All those moments will be lost in time, like ... tears in rain. ... Time to die.
Roy Batty, Blade Runner
#11
Posted 15 June 2012 - 05:05 PM
Yeah. It's not that they lost to them. It's that they lost to them by 24 points. Then waltzed out the next week and lost by 30+ to tulsa. on top of that lost by 30+ to a very average Texas A&M squad and a very good Hoston team,
They're a decent team, on the rise, but far from a quality BCS squad. Quality BCS teams don't lose by 30 points three times in a year.
Very true.
The reason we invited SMU is because of their potential on the football end. They also are seriously looking at getting better in basketball, though how long their new coach stays is way up in the air.
Houston is the better immediate "get" of the two. But both come from a talent rich state and cities with large populations. Hopefully it gets some more eyeballs on our football and longterm improves the conference.
Of all our adds, only Boise State is a proven commodity. SMU, Houston, and (as much as I hate to admit it) UCF all do have good upside, but they are not good BCS teams yet. Temple has taken huge strides and I think they also have good potential. Memphis and SDSU I am not sold on, but I understand why both were invited. Memphis is here because of their basketball. Temple's basketball also favored them as well as their history with the conference.
I think the upside is their for BE football to improve long term and to continue to be better than the ACC. Basketball should remain strong, though losing Pitt and Cuse doesn't help us. Even so, adding Temple and Memphis does help to ease that loss. Syracuse is really the irreplaceable member in the basketball end, but we've got plenty of good basketball staying behind and should continue to rank as the #1 or #2 basketball conference each year.
#12
Posted 15 June 2012 - 08:15 PM
#13
Posted 16 June 2012 - 11:39 AM
#14
Posted 16 June 2012 - 10:59 PM
"They hit us as hard as we've been hit all year," Bowden said




Back to top









